Jag har tagit med hela de 3 styckena jag hämtade citatet ifrån så det blir lite mer kontext till det. Just de bitarna jag plockade ut är grönmarkerade. Det är väl ganska uppenbart vad jag ändrat (och inte alls uppenbart är att jag också fixat ett översättningsfel i den svenska texten där det stod ”mannen plötsligt blev annorlunda” istället för ”
namnen plötsligt blev annorlunda”. Eller översättningsfel? Min svenska upplaga är tryckt 1973, så jag gissar att det är sättaren som läst fel eller på annat sätt sjabblat med blytyperna och att man sedan inte upptäckt felet när man gjort korrektur. Tyvärr inte första felet av det här slaget jag upptäckt, fast jag bara jämfört små stycken när jag hämtat citat. Vilket får mig att misstänka att det finns en hel del fel i översättningen, vilket är synd, för jag tycker annars den känns väldigt bra.)
There was, of course, no admission that any change had taken place. Merely it became known, with extreme suddenness and everywhere at once, that Eastasia and not Eurasia was the enemy. Winston was taking part in a demonstration in one of the central London squares at the moment when it happened. It was night, and the white faces and the scarlet banners were luridly floodlit. The square was packed with several thousand people, including a block of about a thousand schoolchildren in the uniform of the Spies. On a scarlet-draped platform an orator of the Inner Party, a small lean man with disproportionately long arms and a large bald skull over which a few lank locks straggled, was haranguing the crowd. A little Rumpelstiltskin figure, contorted with hatred, he gripped the neck of the microphone with one hand while the other, enormous at the end of a bony arm, clawed the air menacingly above his head. His voice, made metallic by the amplifiers, boomed forth an endless catalogue of atrocities, massacres, deportations, lootings, rapings, torture of prisoners, bombing of civilians, lying propaganda, unjust aggressions, broken treaties. It was almost impossible to listen to him without being first convinced and then maddened. At every few moments the fury of the crowd boiled over and the voice of the speaker was drowned by a wild beast- like roaring that rose uncontrollably from thousands of throats. The most savage yells of all came from the schoolchildren. The speech had been proceeding for perhaps twenty minutes when a messenger hurried on to the platform and a scrap of paper was slipped into the speaker’s hand. He unrolled and read it without pausing in his speech. Nothing altered in his voice or manner, or in the content of what he was saying, but suddenly the names were different. Without words said, a wave of understanding rippled through the crowd. Oceania was at war with Eastasia! The next moment there was a tremendous commotion. The banners and posters with which the square was decorated were all wrong! Quite half of them had the wrong faces on them. It was sabotage! The agents of Goldstein had been at work! There was a riotous interlude while posters were ripped from the walls, banners torn to shreds and trampled underfoot. The Spies performed prodigies of activity in clambering over the rooftops and cutting the streamers that fluttered from the chimneys. But within two or three minutes it was all over. The orator, still gripping the neck of the microphone, his shoulders hunched forward, his free hand clawing at the air, had gone straight on with his speech. One minute more, and the feral roars of rage were again bursting from the crowd. The Hate continued exactly as before, except that the target had been changed.
The thing that impressed Winston in looking back was that the speaker had switched from one line to the other actually in midsentence, not only without a pause, but without even breaking the syntax. But at the moment he had other things to preoccupy him. It was during the moment of disorder while the posters were being torn down that a man whose face he did not see had tapped him on the shoulder and said, ‘Excuse me, I think you’ve dropped your brief-case.’ He took the brief-case abstractedly, without speaking. He knew that it would be days before he had an opportunity to look inside it. The instant that the demonstration was over he went straight to the Ministry of Truth, though the time was now nearly twenty-three hours. The entire staff of the Ministry had done likewise. The orders already issuing from the telescreen, recalling them to their posts, were hardly necessary.
Oceania was at war with Eastasia: Oceania had always been at war with Eastasia. A large part of the political literature of five years was now completely obsolete. Reports and records of all kinds, newspapers, books, pamphlets, films, sound-tracks, photographs — all had to be rectified at
lightning speed. Although no directive was ever issued, it was known that the chiefs of the Department intended that within one week no reference to the war with Eurasia, or the alliance with Eastasia, should remain in existence anywhere. The work was overwhelming, all the more so because the processes that it involved could not be called by their true names. Everyone in the Records Department worked eighteen hours in the twenty-four, with two three-hour snatches of sleep. Mattresses were brought up from the cellars and pitched all over the corridors: meals consisted of sandwiches and Victory Coffee wheeled round on trolleys by attendants from the canteen. Each time that Winston broke off for one of his spells of sleep he tried to leave his desk clear of work, and each time that he crawled back sticky-eyed and aching, it was to find that another shower of paper cylinders had covered the desk like a snowdrift, halfburying the speakwrite and overflowing on to the floor, so that the first job was always to stack them into a neat enough pile to give him room to work. What was worst of all was that the work was by no means purely mechanical. Often it was enough merely to substitute one name for another, but any detailed report of events demanded care and imagination. Even the geographical knowledge that one needed in transferring the war from one part of the world to another was considerable.
George Orwell, 1984, svensk översättning (korrigerad och lätt förvrängd av mig) Nils Holmberg, sjätte upplagan Delfinserien 80, Aldus/Bonniers 1973
Men varför låtsas som att det inte skulle gälla de egna leden?
Samme Ivar Arpi som ville att USA skulle gå in och hjälpa ISIS militärt 2013 ändrade åsikt om dem året efter.
Samme Ivar Arpi som förordade jobbskatteavdraget är nu emot ”pensionärsskatten”.
Osv.
Det är samma med alla nötter.
@MJx:
Nu är jag inte insatt i de specifika fallen med Ivar Arpi som du nämner, så kan inte uttala mig om dem.
Men hur som helst, att man byter åsikt är inte i sig fel, det är bara alla inskränkta fanatiker som aldrig byter åsikt ifråga om någonting. Men det är en viss skillnad mellan att man (mer eller mindre gradvis) skiftar åsikt och opportunistiska lappkast från den ena dan till den andra.
@Dolf (a.k.a. Anders Ericsson):
Men det är just det alla de här offentliga personerna gör. Jag råkar också veta att Ivar Arpi jagade ”nazister” (alltså invandringskritiker) på 90-talet.
Arpi är bara ett exempel, det är samma med alla i det lägret.
Det är som med Aron Flam som Erik skrev om. Han kritiserar identitetspolitiken och postmodernismen till vänster (helt riktigt) men använder sedan samma grunder till sina egna åsikter. Han kritiserar att vissa till vänster inte ens vill höra vissa åsikter och i nästa andetag kritiserar han någon till vänster för att ha lyssnat på en talare som han inte tycker borde fått uttala sig.
Arpi (igen) uttalade sig ganska nyss om att föreningsfriheten bara borde gälla för syjuntor och manskörer. Men så fort den riskeras för föreningar som han inte hatar så kommer han ändra sig.
Det är populism det handlar om i alla fallen. De har inte egna åsikter utan testar vad som säljer.
Hej.
Kan man få svara ’Ja’ på samtliga tre alternativ?
För övrigt hoppas jag att socialmoderaterna med sina folkmordsideologiska stödhjul, samt de nya moderaterna straffas hårt av de klientgrupper de sökt knyta till sig via signal-/symbolpolitik och bidragsallianser. Det brukar vara början till slutet för patron/klient-system där man sedan antingen lyckas (inte sällan via en del våld och rättarting) etablera ordning i enlighet med folkvilja, tradition och kultur eller ett system med ökande endemisk korruption, nya klienter och patroner samt eskalerande våld i vardagen.
Den som är så cynisk att den förväxlar retoriska utspel med kappvändande lär få verkliga problem att bedöma politiken om Löfven et consortes låter handling följa ord. Då, först då, kan man tala om förändring.
Kamratliga hälsningar,
Rikard, fd lärare
@MJx:
Vilket politisk parti leder denna Arpi?
@Kalle:
Han är bara ett exempel.
Vilka partiledare har inte ändrat sig?
@MJx:
Har jag påstått att det existerar någon sådan partiledare?